[1] Mark S. Aldenderfer and Roger K. Blashfield. Cluster Analysis. Number 07-044 in Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage, Beverly Hills, 1984. [ bib ]
[2] Layman E. Allen, Robin B.S. Brooks, and Patricia A. James. Automatic Retrieval of Legal Literature: Why and How. Walter E. Meyer Research Institute of Law, New Haven, Connecticut, 1962. [ bib ]
[3] Layman E. Allen. Beyond document retrieval toward information retrieval. Minnesota Law Review, 47:713-67, 1963. [ bib ]
[4] Layman E. Allen and Mary Ellen Caldwell. Modern logic and judicial decision making: A sketch of one view. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(1):213-70, Winter 1963. Republished in [22]. [ bib ]
[5] Layman E. Allen. Usefulness of modern logic to the readers and writers of legal documents. In Layman E. Allen and Mary E. Caldwell, editors, Communication Sciences and Law: Reflections from the Jurimetrics Conference, chapter 13, pages 83-112. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1965. From the Conference on the Implications of Developments in the Communication Sciences for Legal Education in the Next Decade of the Jurimetrics Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, 5-7 September 1963. [ bib ]
[6] Layman E. Allen. A language-normalization approach to information retrieval in law. Jurimetrics Journal, 9(1):41-56, September 1968. [ bib ]
[7] Layman E. Allen. Analysis of law by symbolic logic. In Robert P. Bigelow, editor, Computers and the Law: An Introductory Handbook, pages 84-90. American Bar Association, third edition, 1981. [ bib ]
[8] Layman Edward Allen. Towards a normalized language to clarify the structure of legal discourse. In Antonio A. Martino, editor, Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems, volume II, pages 349-407. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982. From the International Conference on “Logic, Informatics, Law”, Florence, Italy, April 1981. [ bib ]
[9] Layman E. Allen and Charles S. Saxon. Computer aided normalizing and unpacking: Some interesting machine-processable transformations of legal rules. In Charles Walter, editor, Computing Power and Legal Reasoning, chapter 20, pages 495-572. West Publishing Company, St Paul, 1985. [ bib ]
[10] Layman Allen and Charles Saxon. Exploring computer-aided generation of questions for normalizing legal rules. In Charles Walter, editor, Computer Power and Legal Language: The Use of Computational Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Expert Systems in the Law, chapter 19, pages 243-316. Quorum, New York, 1988. From the Second Annual Conference on Law and Technology, University of Houston, 24-28 June 1985. [ bib ]
[11] Kevin D. Ashley. Reasoning by analogy: A survey of selected AI research with implications for legal expert systems. In Charles Walter, editor, Computing Power and Legal Reasoning, chapter 6, pages 105-27. West Publishing Company, St Paul, 1985. [ bib ]
[12] Kevin D. Ashley and Edwina L. Rissland. Toward modelling legal argument. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 19-30. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986. From the Second International Conference on `Logic, Informatics, Law', Florence, Italy, September 1985. [ bib ]
[13] Kevin D. Ashley and Edwina L. Rissland. But, see, accord: Generating `blue book' citations in HYPO. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 67-74, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[14] Kevin D. Ashley and Edwina L. Rissland. Compare and contrast, a test of expertise. In Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87), volume 1, pages 273-8, Seattle, Washington, 13-17 July 1987. [ bib ]
[15] Kevin D. Ashley and Edwina L. Rissland. Waiting on weighting: A symbolic least commitment approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-88), volume 1, pages 239-44, St Paul, Minnesota, 21-26 August 1988. [ bib ]
[16] Kevin D. Ashley. Defining salience in case-based arguments. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89), volume 1, pages 537-42, Detroit, Michigan, 20-25 August 1989. [ bib ]
[17] Kevin D. Ashley. Toward a computational theory of arguing with precedents: Accomodating [sic] multiple interpretations of cases. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 93-102, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[18] Kevin D. Ashley. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning Series. MIT Press (Bradford), Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990. [ bib ]
[19] Kevin D. Ashley and Vincent Aleven. Toward an intelligent tutoring system for teaching law students to argue with cases. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 42-52, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[20] Vilhelm Aubert. Conscientious objectors before Norwegian military courts. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Decision-Making, volume 4 of International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, chapter vii, pages 201-19. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1963. [ bib ]
[21] John Austin. Lectures on Jurisprudence or The Philosophy of Positive Law. John Murray, London, fifth edition, 1885. Two volumes, revised and edited by Robert Campbell. [ bib ]
[22] Hans W. Baade, editor. Jurimetrics. Basic Books, New York, 1963. Originally published as Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 28, no. 1, Winter 1963. [ bib ]
[23] William M. Bain. A case-based reasoning system for subjective assessment. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86), volume 1, pages 523-7, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 11-15 August 1986. [ bib ]
[24] Zenon Bankowski and D. Neil MacCormick. Statutory interpretation in the United Kingdom. In D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers, editors, Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study, Applied Legal Philosophy Series, chapter 10, pages 359-406. Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1991. [ bib ]
[25] T.J.M. Bench-Capon, G.O. Robinson, T.W. Routen, and M.J. Sergot. Logic programming for large scale applications in law: A formalisation of supplementary benefit legislation. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 190-8, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[26] T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Support for policy makers: Formulating legislation with the aid of logical models. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 181-9, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[27] Trevor Bench-Capon and Marek Sergot. Toward a rule-based representation of open texture in law. In Charles Walter, editor, Computer Power and Legal Language: The Use of Computational Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Expert Systems in the Law, chapter 6, pages 39-60. Quorum, New York, 1988. From the Second Annual Conference on Law and Technology, University of Houston, 24-28 June 1985. [ bib ]
[28] T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Deep models, normative reasoning and legal expert systems. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 37-45, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[29] T.J.M. Bench-Capon, editor. Knowledge-Based Systems and Legal Applications. Number 36 in APIC Series. Academic Press, London, 1991. [ bib ]
[30] Donald H. Berman and Carole D. Hafner. Incorporating procedural context into a model of case-based legal reasoning. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 12-20, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[31] Donald H. Berman. Developer's choice in the legal domain: The Sisyphean journey with CBR or down hill with rules. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 307-9, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. A working paper for the Case-Rules Panel. [ bib ]
[32] Jon Bing and Knut S. Selmer, editors. A Decade of Computers and Law. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1980. [ bib ]
[33] Jon Bing. Legal norms, discretionary rules and computer programs. In Bryan Niblett, editor, Computer Science and Law, chapter 7, pages 119-36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980. [ bib ]
[34] Jon Bing, editor. Handbook of Legal Information Retrieval. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1984. [ bib ]
[35] Jon Bing. Legal information services: Some trends and characteristics. In Colin Campbell, editor, Data Processing and the Law, pages 29-45. Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1984. [ bib ]
[36] Jon Bing. Designing text retrieval systems for `conceptual searching'. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 43-51, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[37] Jon Bing. The law of the books and the law of the files: Possibilities and problems of legal information systems. In G.P.V. Vandenberghe, editor, Advanced Topics of Law and Information Technology, number 3 in Computer/Law Series, pages 151-82. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, 1989. [ bib ]
[38] Jon Bing. [Review of [18]] [ bib ]
[39] Jes Bjarup. Kripke's case: Some remarks on rules, their interpretation and application. Rechtstheorie, 19:39-49, 1988. [ bib ]
[40] William Blackstone. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Oxford (Clarendon), fifth edition, 1773. Four volumes. [ bib ]
[41] Margaret A. Boden. Panel: Artificial intelligence and legal responsibility. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-85), volume 2, pages 1267-8, Los Angeles, California, 18-23 August 1985. [ bib ]
[42] Mette Borchgrevink and Johannes Hansen. SARA: A system for the analysis of legal decisions. In Jon Bing and Knut S. Selmer, editors, A Decade of Computers and Law, chapter 18, pages 342-75. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1980. [ bib ]
[43] James Boswell. The Life of Samuel Johnson, volume I. Heron Books, London, 1960? First published in 1791. [ bib ]
[44] Stephen Bottomley, Neil Gunningham, and Stephen Parker. Law in Context. Federation Press, Leichhardt, 1991. [ bib ]
[45] L. Karl Branting. Representing and reusing explanations of legal precedents. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 103-10, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[46] L. Karl Branting. Reasoning with portions of precedents. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 145-54, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[47] Adrian Brooks. Employment. In Garfield Barwick, editor, Australian Commentary on Halsbury's Laws of England, chapter 56. Butterworths, Sydney, fourth edition, 1990. [ bib ]
[48] Bruce G. Buchanan and Thomas E. Headrick. Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanford Law Review, 23(1):40-62, November 1970. [ bib ]
[49] Bruce G. Buchanan and Edward H. Shortliffe, editors. Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison-Wesley Series in Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1984. [ bib ]
[50] Steven J. Burton. An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1985. [ bib ]
[51] J.A. Campbell. The expert computer and professional negligence: who is liable? In Masoud Yazdani and Ajit Narayanan, editors, Artificial Intelligence: Human Effects, Ellis Horwood Series in Artificial Intelligence, pages 37-51. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1984. [ bib ]
[52] Phillip Capper and Richard E. Susskind. Latent Damage Law-The Expert System. Butterworths, London, 1988. [ bib ]
[53] Lewis Carroll. The Complete Illustrated Works of Lewis Carroll. Avenel Books, New York, 1982. [ bib ]
[54] Victor B. Ciesielski. Some experiments in the use of expert systems for legislation and regulations. Technical Report 21, Key Centre for Knowledge Based Systems, Departments of Computer Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and The University of Melbourne, 27 April 1990. [ bib ]
[55] Jon Clark and Kenneth Wedderburn. Modern labour law: Problems, functions, and policies. In Kenneth Wedderburn, Roy Lewis, and Jon Clark, editors, Labour Law and Industrial Relations: Building on Kahn-Freund, chapter 6, pages 127-242. Oxford University Press (Clarendon), Oxford, 1983. [ bib ]
[56] Roger Clarke. Legal aspects of knowledge-based technology. Journal of Information Technology, 3(1):9-16, March 1988. [ bib ]
[57] Andrew Clark. [Review of [240]] [ bib ]
[58] John G. Claudy. A comparison of five variable weighting procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32(2):311-22, Summer 1972. [ bib ]
[59] W.J. Conover. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley, New York, 1971. [ bib ]
[60] Sandra Cook, Carole D. Hafner, L. Thorne McCarty, Jeffrey A. Meldman, Mark Peterson, James A. Sprowl, N.S. Sridharan, and D.A. Waterman. The applications of artificial intelligence to law: A survey of six current projects. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 50:689-96, 1981. From the National Computer Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 4-7 May 1981. [ bib ]
[61] T.M. Cover and P.E. Hart. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-13(1):21-7, January 1967. [ bib ]
[62] W.B. Creighton, W.J. Ford, and R.J. Mitchell. Labour Law: Materials and Commentary. Law Book Company, Sydney, 1983. [ bib ]
[63] Rupert Cross. Precedent in English Law. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford University Press (Clarendon), London, 1961. [ bib ]
[64] Stanley O. Croydon, Jr. JURIS: A tool for legal research. In Beth Krevitt Eres, editor, Legal and Legislative Information Processing, chapter 11, pages 163-72. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 1980. [ bib ]
[65] Anthony D'Amato. Can/should computers replace judges? Georgia Law Review, 11(5):1277-1301, September 1977. [ bib ]
[66] Cary G. deBessonet and George R. Cross. Representation of some aspects of legal causality. In Charles Walter, editor, Computing Power and Legal Reasoning, chapter 11, pages 205-14. West Publishing Company, St Paul, 1985. [ bib ]
[67] Cary G. deBessonet and George R. Cross. Conceptual retrieval and legal decision-making. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 219-27. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986. From the Second International Conference on `Logic, Informatics, Law', Florence, Italy, September 1985. [ bib ]
[68] Cary deBessonet and George Cross. Distinguishing legal language-types for conceptual retrieval. In Charles Walter, editor, Computer Power and Legal Language: The Use of Computational Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Expert Systems in the Law, chapter 14, pages 155-66. Quorum, New York, 1988. From the Second Annual Conference on Law and Technology, University of Houston, 24-28 June 1985. [ bib ]
[69] Judith P. Dick. Representation of legal text for conceptual retrieval. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 244-53, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[70] William O. Douglas. The dissent: A safeguard of democracy. Journal of the American Judicature Society, 32:104-7, December 1948. [ bib ]
[71] Peter Drahos and Stephen Parker. Rule following, rule scepticism and indeterminacy in law: A conventional account. Ratio Juris, 5(1):109-19, March 1992. [ bib ]
[72] Ronald Dworkin. Taking Rights Seriously. Duckworth, London, 1977. [ bib ]
[73] Ronald Dworkin. No right answer? New York University Law Review, 53(1):1-32, April 1978. [ bib ]
[74] T.S. Eliot. Collected Poems 1909-1962. Faber and Faber, London, 1963. [ bib ]
[75] Brian Everitt. Cluster Analysis. Number 11 in Social Science Research Council Reviews of Current Research. Heinemann Educational Books, London, 1974. [ bib ]
[76] E.A. Feigenbaum. Expert systems in the 1980s. In A.H. Bond, editor, Machine Intelligence, number 3 in Infotech State of the Art Report Series 9, pages 219-29. Pergamon Infotech, Maidenhead, Berkshire, 1981. [ bib ]
[77] Edward A. Feigenbaum and Pamela McCorduck. The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1983. [ bib ]
[78] Ronald A. Fisher. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Hafner, New York, fourteenth edition, 1970. [ bib ]
[79] E. Fix and J.L. Hodges, Jr. Discriminatory analysis, non-parametric discrimination. Project 21-49-004, Report 4, United States Air Force School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph Field, Texas, February 1951. [ bib ]
[80] Jerome Frank. Law and the Modern Mind. Brentano's, New York, 1930. [ bib ]
[81] Jerome Frank. Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1949. [ bib ]
[82] John Galsworthy. Ten Famous Plays. Duckworth, London, 1941. [ bib ]
[83] Anne von der Lieth Gardner. The design of a legal analysis program. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-83), pages 114-18, Washington, DC, 22-26 August 1983. [ bib ]
[84] Anne von der Lieth Gardner. An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning. PhD Thesis STAN-CS-85-1045, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, June 1984. [ bib ]
[85] Anne v.d.L. Gardner. Overview of an artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning. In Charles Walter, editor, Computing Power and Legal Reasoning, chapter 13, pages 247-74. West Publishing Company, St Paul, 1985. [ bib ]
[86] Anne von der Lieth Gardner. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning Series. MIT Press (Bradford), Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1987. [ bib ]
[87] John Gay. Fables. William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California, Los Angeles, 1967. Reprint of the 1727 (vol. I) and 1738 (vol. II) editions. [ bib ]
[88] W.S. Gilbert. The Savoy Operas: Being the Complete Text of the Gilbert and Sullivan Operas as originally produced in the years 1875-1896. Macmillan, London, 1977. [ bib ]
[89] Sheldon Goldman and Austin Sarat, editors. American Court Systems: Readings in Judicial Process and Behavior. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1978. [ bib ]
[90] David I. Gold and Richard E. Susskind. Expert systems in law: A jurisprudential and formal specification approach. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 625-42. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986. From the Second International Conference on `Logic, Informatics, Law', Florence, Italy, September 1985. [ bib ]
[91] Seth R. Goldman, Michael G. Dyer, and Margot Flowers. Precedent-based legal reasoning and knowledge acquisition in contract law: A process model. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 210-21, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[92] Graham Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray, and Alan L. Tyree. Expert systems in law: The DataLex project. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 9-17, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[93] G.W. Greenleaf, A.S. Mowbray, and D.P. Lewis. Australasian Computerised Legal Information Handbook. Butterworths, Sydney, 1988. [ bib ]
[94] Graham Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray, and Alan Tyree. The DataLex legal workstation-integrating tools for lawyers. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 215-24, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[95] W.F. Grunbaum. [Review of [86]] [ bib ]
[96] Charles M. Haar, John P. Sawyer, Jr, and Stephen J. Cummings. Computer power and legal reasoning: A case study of judicial decision prediction in zoning amendment cases. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, (3):651-768, Summer 1977. [ bib ]
[97] Carole D. Hafner. Representation of knowledge in a legal information retrieval system. In R.N. Oddy, S.E. Robertson, C.J. van Rijsbergen, and P.W. Williams, editors, Information Retrieval Research, chapter 9, pages 139-53. Butterworths, London, 1981. From a symposium “Research and Development in Information Retrieval”, St John's College, Cambridge, June 1980. [ bib ]
[98] Carole D. Hafner. Conceptual organization of case law knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 35-42, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[99] J.W. Harris. Legal Philosophies. Butterworths, London, 1980. [ bib ]
[100] H.L.A. Hart. The Concept of Law. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford University Press (Clarendon), London, 1961. [ bib ]
[101] H.L.A. Hart. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford University Press (Clarendon), London, 1983. [ bib ]
[102] Frederick Hayes-Roth, Donald A. Waterman, and Douglas B. Lenat, editors. Building Expert Systems. Teknowledge Series in Knowledge Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1983. [ bib ]
[103] Bob Hepple. Restructuring employment rights. The Industrial Law Journal, 15:69-83, 1986. [ bib ]
[104] Theodor Herman. WESTLAW: Computerized legal research program of West Publishing Company. In Beth Krevitt Eres, editor, Legal and Legislative Information Processing, chapter 10, pages 157-61. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 1980. [ bib ]
[105] O.W. Holmes. The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 10(8):457-78, 25 March 1897. [ bib ]
[106] Peter Johnson and David Mead. Legislative knowledge base systems for public administration-Some practical issues. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 108-17, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[107] R. Jones. [Review of [86]] [ bib ]
[108] Irving Kayton. Can jurimetrics be of value to jurisprudence? The George Washington Law Review, 33(1):287-317, October 1964. [ bib ]
[109] Mark Kelman. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1987. [ bib ]
[110] Hans Kelsen. General Theory of Law and State, volume I of 20th Century Legal Philosophy Series. Russell and Russell, New York, 1945. [ bib ]
[111] Hans Kelsen. Pure Theory of Law. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1967. Translation of Reine Rechtslehre (1960, second revised edition). [ bib ]
[112] Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie. The C Programming Language. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, second edition, 1988. [ bib ]
[113] Donald E. Knuth. The TEXbook. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1984. [ bib ]
[114] Donald E. Knuth. TEX: The Program, volume B of Computers and Typesetting. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1986. [ bib ]
[115] Donald E. Knuth. METAFONT: The Program, volume D of Computers and Typesetting. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1986. [ bib ]
[116] Donald E. Knuth and Silvio Levy. The CWEB system of structured documentation. Manual, Version 3.0, 1994. [ bib ]
[117] Fred Kort. Simultaneous equations and boolean algebra in the analysis of judicial decisions. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(1):143-63, Winter 1963. Republished in [22]. [ bib ]
[118] Fred Kort. Content analysis of judicial opinions and rules of law. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Decision-Making, volume 4 of International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, chapter vi, pages 133-97. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1963. [ bib ]
[119] Robert Kowalski and Marek Sergot. Computer representation of the law. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-85), volume 2, pages 1269-70, Los Angeles, California, 18-23 August 1985. [ bib ]
[120] Robert Kowalski. The treatment of negation in logic programs for representing legislation. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 11-15, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[121] Robert Kowalski and Marek Sergot. The use of logical models in legal problem solving. Ratio Juris, 3(2):201-18, July 1990. [ bib ]
[122] Andrzej Kowalski. Case-based reasoning and the deep structure approach to knowledge representation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 21-30, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[123] Saul A. Kripke. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982. [ bib ]
[124] Martin Krygier. Julius Stone: Leeways of choice, legal tradition and the declaratory theory of law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 9(2):26-38, 1986. [ bib ]
[125] Kenneth A. Lambert and Mark H. Grunewald. LESTER: Using paradigm cases in a quasi-precedential legal domain. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 87-92, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[126] Kenneth A. Lambert and Mark H. Grunewald. Legal theory and case-based reasoners: The importance of context and the process of focusing. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 191-5, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[127] Leslie Lamport. LATEX: A Document Preparation System. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1986. Describes LATEX 2.09. [ bib ]
[128] Leslie Lamport. LATEX: A Document Preparation System. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, second edition, 1994. Describes LATEX 2e. [ bib ]
[129] Harold D. Lasswell. Current studies of the decision process: Automation versus creativity. The Western Political Quarterly, 8(3):381-99, September 1955. [ bib ]
[130] Reed C. Lawlor. What computers can do: Analysis and prediction of judicial decisions. American Bar Association Journal, 49(4):337-44, April 1963. [ bib ]
[131] Reed C. Lawlor. Personal stare decisis. Southern California Law Review, 41:73-118, 1968. [ bib ]
[132] Reed C. Lawlor. Fact content of cases and precedent-A modern theory of precedent. Jurimetrics Journal, 12(4):245-70, June 1972. Excerpts from a paper presented at the September 1971 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. [ bib ]
[133] Reed C. Lawlor. Analysis and prediction of judicial decisions. In Robert P. Bigelow, editor, Computers and the Law: An Introductory Handbook, pages 81-4. American Bar Association, third edition, 1981. [ bib ]
[134] Philip Leith. An IKBS implementation. Software-Practice and Experience, 15(1):65-86, January 1985. [ bib ]
[135] Philip Leith. Law and computer program: The limits to logic. Paper, Department of Jurisprudence, Queen's University, Belfast, March 1985. [ bib ]
[136] Philip Leith. Clear rules and legal expert systems. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 661-79. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986. From the Second International Conference on `Logic, Informatics, Law', Florence, Italy, September 1985. [ bib ]
[137] Philip Leith. [Review of [168], and [276]] [ bib ]
[138] Philip Leith. The Emperor's new expert system. The Modern Law Review, 50(1):128-32, January 1987. [ bib ]
[139] Edward H. Levi. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. University of Chicago Press (Phoenix), Chicago, 1949. [ bib ]
[140] Karl N. Llewellyn. Some realism about realism-Responding to Dean Pound. Harvard Law Review, 44(8):1222-64, June 1931. [ bib ]
[141] K.N. Llewellyn. The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and its Study. Oceana Publications, New York, 1951. [ bib ]
[142] Karl N. Llewellyn. Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962. [ bib ]
[143] Lee Loevinger. Jurimetrics: The next step forward. Minnesota Law Review, 33(5):455-93, April 1949. [ bib ]
[144] Lee Loevinger. Jurimetrics: Science and prediction in the field of law. Minnesota Law Review, 46(2):255-75, December 1961. [ bib ]
[145] Lee Loevinger. Jurimetrics: The methodology of legal inquiry. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(1):5-35, Winter 1963. Republished in [22]. [ bib ]
[146] Lee Loevinger. Jurimetrics. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Behavior: A Reader in Theory and Research, Rand McNally Political Science Series, chapter I.C.7, pages 72-6. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago, 1964. Extracts from [143]. [ bib ]
[147] E.V. Lucas, editor. The Letters of Charles Lamb to which are added those of his sister Mary Lamb, volume III. Dent and Methuen, London, 1935. [ bib ]
[148] Neil MacCormick. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford University Press (Clarendon), Oxford, 1978. [ bib ]
[149] Ejan Mackaay and Pierre Robillard. Predicting judicial decisions: The nearest neighbour rule and visual representation of case patterns. Datenverarbeitung im Recht, 3(3/4):302-31, November 1974. [ bib ]
[150] Peter B. Maggs and Cary G. deBessonet. Automated logical analysis of systems of legal rules. Jurimetrics Journal, 12(3):158-69, March 1972. [ bib ]
[151] L. Thorne McCarty. Reflections on TAXMAN: An experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harvard Law Review, 90(5):837-93, March 1977. [ bib ]
[152] L. Thorne McCarty. Some requirements for a computer-based legal consultant. Technical Report LRP-TR-8, Laboratory for Computer Science Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1 July 1980. Published, with minor abbreviations, as [153]. [ bib ]
[153] L. Thorne McCarty. Some requirements for a computer-based legal consultant. In Proceedings of the First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-80), pages 298-300, Stanford University, 18-21 August 1980. [ bib ]
[154] L. Thorne McCarty. The TAXMAN project: Towards a cognitive theory of legal argument. In Bryan Niblett, editor, Computer Science and Law, chapter 3, pages 23-43. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980. [ bib ]
[155] L. Thorne McCarty and N.S. Sridharan. The representation of an evolving system of legal concepts: II. Prototypes and deformations. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-81), volume I, pages 246-53, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 24-28 August 1981. [ bib ]
[156] L. Thorne McCarty. A computational theory of Eisner v. Macomber. In Constantino Ciampi, editor, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Information Systems, volume I, pages 329-55. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982. From the International Conference on “Logic, Informatics, Law”, Florence, Italy, April 1981. [ bib ]
[157] L. Thorne McCarty. Intelligent legal information systems: Problems and prospects. Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, 9(2):265-94, 1983. Republished as [158]. [ bib ]
[158] L. Thorne McCarty. Intelligent legal information systems: Problems and prospects. In Colin Campbell, editor, Data Processing and the Law, pages 125-51. Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1984. [ bib ]
[159] L. Thorne McCarty. Permissions and obligations: An informal introduction. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 307-37. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986. From the Second International Conference on `Logic, Informatics, Law', Florence, Italy, September 1985. [ bib ]
[160] L. Thorne McCarty. A language for legal discourse: I. Basic features. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 180-9, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[161] L. Thorne McCarty. Artificial intelligence and law: How to get there from here. Ratio Juris, 3(2):189-200, July 1990. [ bib ]
[162] L. Thorne McCarty. On the role of prototypes in appellate legal argument (abstract). In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 185-90, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[163] John McMillan. Developments under the ADJR Act: The grounds of review. Federal Law Review, 20(1):50-82, 1991. Revised version of a paper presented at the Conference “Ten Years of the Federal Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act”, Canberra, September 1990. [ bib ]
[164] Lucien Mehl. Automation in the legal world: From the machine processing of legal information to the `law machine'. In Mechanisation of Thought Processes, volume II, pages 755-87. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1959. From a symposium held at the National Physical Laboratory, 24-27 November 1958. [ bib ]
[165] Jeffrey A. Meldman. A structural model for computer-aided legal analysis. Rutgers Journal of Computers and the Law, 6(1):27-71, 1977. [ bib ]
[166] Simon Mendelson. An attempted dimensional analysis of the law governing government appeals in criminal cases. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 128-37, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[167] Robert Michaelsen and Donald Michie. Expert systems in business. Datamation, 29(11):240-6, November 1983. [ bib ]
[168] Donald Michie and Rory Johnston. The Creative Computer: Machine Intelligence and Human Knowledge. Penguin (Viking), Harmondsworth, 1984. [ bib ]
[169] Robert N. Moles. Definition and Rule in Legal Theory: A Reassessment of H.L.A. Hart and the Positivist Tradition. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1987. [ bib ]
[170] Robert N. Moles. Logic programming-An assessment of its potential for artificial intelligence applications in law. Journal of Law and Information Science, 2(2):137-64, 1991. [ bib ]
[171] Robert N. Moles and Surendra Dayal. There is more to life than logic. Journal of Law and Information Science, 3(2):188-218, 1992. [ bib ]
[172] Montesquieu. De l'Esprit des lois, volume I. Garnier Frères, Paris, 1973. First published in 1748. [ bib ]
[173] Gwen Morris, Catriona Cook, Robin Creyke, and Robert Geddes. Laying Down the Law: The Foundations of Legal Reasoning, Research and Writing in Australia and New Zealand. Butterworths, Sydney, third edition, 1992. [ bib ]
[174] Frank Muir. The Frank Muir Book: An Irreverent Companion to Social History. Heinemann, London, 1976. [ bib ]
[175] Lionel Murphy. The responsibility of judges. In Gareth Evans, editor, Law, Politics and the Labor Movement, chapter 1, pages 2-10. Legal Service Bulletin, Law Faculty, Monash University, Clayton, 1980. [ bib ]
[176] Stuart Nagel. Using simple calculations to predict judicial decisions. American Behavioral Scientist, 4(4):24-8, December 1960. [ bib ]
[177] Stuart S. Nagel. Off-the-bench judicial attitudes. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Decision-Making, volume 4 of International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, chapter ii, pages 29-53. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1963. [ bib ]
[178] Stuart S. Nagel. Microcomputers and judicial prediction. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 681-702. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986. From the Second International Conference on `Logic, Informatics, Law', Florence, Italy, September 1985. [ bib ]
[179] Stuart S. Nagel. Decision-Aiding Software and Legal Decision-Making: A Guide to Skills and Applications Throughout the Law. Quorum, New York, 1989. [ bib ]
[180] John Neter, William Wasserman, and G.A. Whitmore. Applied Statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, second edition, 1982. [ bib ]
[181] Bryan Niblett. Expert systems for lawyers. Computers and Law, (29):2-4, August 1981. [ bib ]
[182] Bryan Niblett. [Review of [240]] [ bib ]
[183] G.J. van Opdorp, R.F. Walker, J.A. Schrickx, C. Groendijk, and P.H. van den Berg. Networks at work: A connectionist approach to non-deductive legal reasoning. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 278-87, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[184] A. Oskamp, R.F. Walker, J.A. Schrickx, and P.H. van den Berg. PROLEXS, divide and rule: a legal application. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 54-62, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[185] A. Oskamp. Knowledge representation and legal expert systems. In G.P.V. Vandenberghe, editor, Advanced Topics of Law and Information Technology, number 3 in Computer/Law Series, pages 195-211. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, 1989. [ bib ]
[186] Michael Pattison and Victor B. Ciesielski. Using expert systems and conceptual graphs to review legal contracts. Technical Report 22, Key Centre for Knowledge Based Systems, Departments of Computer Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and The University of Melbourne, 10 May 1990. [ bib ]
[187] Dennis Pearce, Enid Campbell, and Don Harding. Australian Law Schools: A Discipline Assessment for the Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission, volume 1. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1987. [ bib ]
[188] D.C. Pearce and R.S. Geddes. Statutory Interpretation in Australia. Butterworths, Sydney, third edition, 1988. [ bib ]
[189] Walter G. Popp and Bernhard Schlink. JUDITH, a computer program to advise lawyers in reasoning a case. Jurimetrics Journal, 15(4):303-14, Summer 1975. [ bib ]
[190] James Popple. Legal expert systems: The inadequacy of a rule-based approach. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Australian Computer Science Conference (ACSC-13), pages 303-13, Monash University, Melbourne, 7-9 February 1990. Australian Computer Science Communications, vol. 12, no. 1. [ bib | .pdf ]
[191] James Popple. Legal expert systems: The inadequacy of a rule-based approach. In Selim G. Akl, Frank Fiala, and Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, editors, Advances in Computing and Information: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing and Information (ICCI-90), pages 348-51, Niagara Falls, Canada, 23-26 May 1990. Canadian Scholars' Press, Toronto. [ bib | .pdf ]
[192] James Popple. Legal expert systems: The inadequacy of a rule-based approach. The Australian Computer Journal, 23(1):11-16, February 1991. [ bib | .pdf ]
[193] James Popple. SHYSTER: A Pragmatic Legal Expert System. PhD thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, April 1993. [ bib | .pdf ]
[194] James Popple. SHYSTER: The program. Technical Report TR-CS-93-13, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The Australian National University, Canberra, December 1993. [ bib | .pdf ]
[195] James Popple. A Pragmatic Legal Expert System. Applied Legal Philosophy Series. Dartmouth, Aldershot, May 1996. [ bib | .pdf ]
[196] Roscoe Pound. Mechanical jurisprudence. Columbia Law Review, 8(8):605-23, December 1908. [ bib ]
[197] J.R. Quinlan. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1):81-106, 1986. [ bib ]
[198] J.R. Quinlan, P.J. Compton, K.A. Horn, and L. Lazarus. Inductive knowledge acquisition: a case study. In J. Ross Quinlan, editor, Applications of Expert Systems, chapter 9, pages 157-73. Addison-Wesley, Sydney, 1987. Based on the proceedings of the Second Australian Conference on Applications of Expert Systems, May 1986. [ bib ]
[199] J.R. Quinlan. Induction, knowledge and expert systems. In John S. Gero and Robin Stanton, editors, Artificial Intelligence Developments and Applications, chapter 17, pages 253-71. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1988. From the Australian Joint Artificial Intelligence Conference, Sydney, Australia, 2-4 November 1987. [ bib ]
[200] Hugh Rawson. A Dictionary of Invective: A Treasury of Curses, Insults, Put-Downs, and Other Formerly Unprintable Terms from Anglo-Saxon Times to the Present. Robert Hale, London, 1991. [ bib ]
[201] Staniforth Ricketson. The Law of Intellectual Property. Law Book Company, Sydney, 1984. [ bib ]
[202] Edwina L. Rissland. Examples in legal reasoning: Legal hypotheticals. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83), volume 1, pages 90-3, Karlsruhe, West Germany, 8-12 August 1983. [ bib ]
[203] Edwina L. Rissland, Eduardo M. Valcarce, and Kevin D. Ashley. Explaining and arguing with examples. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-84), pages 288-94, University of Texas at Austin, 6-10 August 1984. [ bib ]
[204] Edwina L. Rissland. Argument moves and hypotheticals. In Charles Walter, editor, Computing Power and Legal Reasoning, chapter 7, pages 129-43. West Publishing Company, St Paul, 1985. [ bib ]
[205] Edwina L. Rissland and Kevin D. Ashley. A case-based system for trade secrets law. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 60-6, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[206] Edwina L. Rissland and David B. Skalak. Combining case-based and rule-based reasoning: A heuristic approach. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89), volume 1, pages 524-30, Detroit, Michigan, 20-25 August 1989. [ bib ]
[207] Edwina L. Rissland and David B. Skalak. Interpreting statutory predicates. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 46-53, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[208] Edwina L. Rissland and Kevin D. Ashley. HYPO: A precedent-based legal reasoner. In G.P.V. Vandenberghe, editor, Advanced Topics of Law and Information Technology, number 3 in Computer/Law Series, pages 213-34. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, 1989. [ bib ]
[209] Edwina L. Rissland. Dimension-based analysis of hypotheticals from Supreme Court oral argument. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 111-20, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[210] Edwina L. Rissland. Artificial intelligence and law: Stepping stones to a model of legal reasoning. The Yale Law Journal, 99(8):1957-81, June 1990. [ bib ]
[211] Kathryn E. Sanders. Representing and reasoning about open-textured predicates. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 137-44, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[212] Frank L. Schmidt. The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31(3):699-714, Autumn 1971. [ bib ]
[213] Glendon Schubert. Judicial attitudes and voting behavior: The 1961 term of the United States Supreme Court. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(1):100-42, Winter 1963. Republished in [22]. [ bib ]
[214] Glendon Schubert. Civilian control and stare decisis in the Warren Court. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Decision-Making, volume 4 of International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, chapter iii, pages 55-77. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1963. [ bib ]
[215] Glendon Schubert. The importance of computer technology to political science research in judicial behavior. Jurimetrics Journal, 8(3):56-63, March 1968. [ bib ]
[216] Glendon Schubert. Human Jurisprudence: Public Law as Political Science. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1975. [ bib ]
[217] M.J. Sergot, F. Sadri, R.A. Kowalski, F. Kriwaczek, P. Hammond, and H.T. Cory. The British Nationality Act as a logic program. Communications of the ACM, 29(5):370-86, May 1986. [ bib ]
[218] Marek Sergot, Therese Cory, Peter Hammond, Robert Kowalski, Frank Kriwaczek, and Fariba Sadri. Formalisation of the British Nationality Act. In Christopher Arnold, editor, Yearbook of Law Computers and Technology, volume 2, pages 40-52. Butterworths, London, 1986. [ bib ]
[219] David T. Shannon and Forouzan Golshani. On the automation of legal reasoning. Jurimetrics Journal, 28(3):305-15, Spring 1988. [ bib ]
[220] David M. Sherman. A PROLOG model of the Income Tax Act of Canada. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 127-36, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[221] David M. Sherman. Expert systems and ICAI in tax law: Killing two birds with one AI stone. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 74-80, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[222] Brian Simpson. The common law and legal theory. In William Twining, editor, Legal Theory and Common Law, chapter 2, pages 8-25. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986. [ bib ]
[223] David B. Skalak. Taking advantage of models for legal classification. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 234-41, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[224] David B. Skalak and Edwina L. Rissland. Argument moves in a rule-guided domain. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 1-11, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[225] David B. Skalak and Edwina L. Rissland. Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1(1):3-44, 1992. [ bib ]
[226] Ian Smith. Employment. In Lord Hailsham of St Marylebone, editor, Halsbury's Laws of England (fourth edition reissue), volume 16. Butterworths, London, 1992. [ bib ]
[227] Peter H.A. Sneath and Robert R. Sokal. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973. [ bib ]
[228] Harold J. Spaeth. Warren Court attitudes toward business: The `B' scale. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Decision-Making, volume 4 of International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, chapter iv, pages 79-108. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1963. [ bib ]
[229] Joseph J. Spengler. Machine-made justice: Some implications. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(1):36-52, Winter 1963. Republished in [22]. [ bib ]
[230] James A. Sprowl. Automating the legal reasoning process: A computer that uses regulations and statutes to draft legal documents. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, (1):1-81, Winter 1979. [ bib ]
[231] Ronald Stamper. LEGOL: Modelling legal rules by computer. In Bryan Niblett, editor, Computer Science and Law, chapter 4, pages 45-71. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980. [ bib ]
[232] Ronald Stamper, Clare Tagg, Peter Mason, Sandra Cook, and Jo Marks. Developing the LEGOL semantic grammar. In Constantino Ciampi, editor, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Information Systems, volume I, pages 357-79. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982. From the International Conference on “Logic, Informatics, Law”, Florence, Italy, April 1981. [ bib ]
[233] Ronald Stamper. A non-classical logic for based on the structures of behaviour [ sic]. In Antonio A. Martino and Fiorenza Socci Natali, editors, Automated Analysis of Legal Texts: Logic, Informatics, Law, pages 115-39. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1986. From the Second International Conference on `Logic, Informatics, Law', Florence, Italy, September 1985. [ bib ]
[234] Karlyn D. Stanley. LEXIS: Legal research and litigation support. In Beth Krevitt Eres, editor, Legal and Legislative Information Processing, chapter 9, pages 149-56. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 1980. [ bib ]
[235] Julius Stone. Legal System and Lawyers' Reasonings. Maitland, Sydney, 1964. [ bib ]
[236] Julius Stone. Man and machine in the search for justice. Stanford Law Review, 16:515-60, May 1964. [ bib ]
[237] Julius Stone. Social Dimensions of Law and Justice. Maitland, Sydney, 1966. [ bib ]
[238] Julius Stone. Precedent and Law: Dynamics of Common Law Growth. Butterworths, Sydney, 1985. [ bib ]
[239] Richard E. Susskind. Expert systems in law: A jurisprudential approach to artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. The Modern Law Review, 49(2):168-94, March 1986. [ bib ]
[240] Richard E. Susskind. Expert Systems in Law: A Jurisprudential Inquiry. Oxford University Press (Clarendon), Oxford, 1987. [ bib ]
[241] Richard E. Susskind. Expert systems in law: Out of the research laboratory and into the marketplace. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-87), pages 1-8, Boston, Massachusetts, 27-29 May 1987. [ bib ]
[242] Richard Susskind. Pragmatism and purism in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. AI and Society, 3(1):28-38, January-March 1989. [ bib ]
[243] Richard E. Susskind. The Latent Damage System: A jurisprudential analysis. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 23-32, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[244] Richard E. Susskind. [Review of [86]] [ bib ]
[245] Joseph Tanenhaus, Marvin Schick, Matthew Muraskin, and Daniel Rosen. The Supreme Court's certiorari jurisdiction: Cue theory. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Decision-Making, volume 4 of International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, chapter v, pages 111-32. Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1963. [ bib ]
[246] Colin Tapper. Lawyers and machines. The Modern Law Review, 26(2):121-37, March 1963. [ bib ]
[247] Colin Tapper. Computers and the Law. Law in Context. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1973. [ bib ]
[248] Colin Tapper. An experiment with citation vectors. In Colin Campbell, editor, Data Processing and the Law, pages 90-109. Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1984. [ bib ]
[249] Bart T. Thomas. Unauthorized practice and computer aided legal analysis systems. Jurimetrics Journal, 20(1):41-51, Fall 1979. [ bib ]
[250] I.S. Torsun. PAYE: A tax expert system. In M.A. Bramer, editor, Research and Development in Expert Systems III, British Computer Society Workshop Series, pages 69-80. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987. From Expert Systems '86: the Sixth Annual Technical Conference of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert Systems, Brighton, 15-18 December 1986. [ bib ]
[251] A.M. Turing. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236):433-60, October 1950. [ bib ]
[252] Horace Twiss. The Public and Private Life of Lord Chancellor Eldon, with Selections from his Correspondence, volume III. John Murray, London, second edition, 1844. [ bib ]
[253] Alan L. Tyree. The geometry of case law. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 8:403-20, 1977. [ bib ]
[254] Alan L. Tyree. Can a `deterministic' computer judge overrule himself? Rutgers Journal of Computers, Technology and the Law, 7(2):381-4, 1980. [ bib ]
[255] Alan L. Tyree. Fact content analysis of case law: Methods and limitations. Jurimetrics Journal, 22(1):1-33, Fall 1981. [ bib ]
[256] A. Tyree. FINDER: An expert system. In Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Conference of the Australasian Universities Law Schools Association, University of Adelaide, 26-29 August 1985. [ bib ]
[257] Alan Tyree. Expert systems and the law: Will justice fall to bits? Current Affairs Bulletin, 62(10):13-18, March 1986. [ bib ]
[258] Alan L. Tyree, Graham Greenleaf, and Andrew Mowbray. Legal reasoning: the problem of precedent. In John S. Gero and Robin Stanton, editors, Artificial Intelligence Developments and Applications, chapter 16, pages 231-47. Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1988. From the Australian Joint Artificial Intelligence Conference, Sydney, Australia, 2-4 November 1987. [ bib ]
[259] Alan Tyree. Expert Systems in Law. Prentice Hall, New York, 1989. [ bib ]
[260] Alan L. Tyree, Graham Greenleaf, and Andrew Mo[w]bray. Generating legal arguments. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2(1):46-51, March 1989. [ bib ]
[261] Alan L. Tyree. The logic programming debate. Journal of Law and Information Science, 3(1):111-15, 1992. [ bib ]
[262] S. Sidney Ulmer. Quantitative analysis of judicial processes: Some practical and theoretical applications. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(1):164-84, Winter 1963. Republished in [22]. [ bib ]
[263] S. Sidney Ulmer. Homeostasis in the Supreme Court. In Glendon Schubert, editor, Judicial Behavior: A Reader in Theory and Research, Rand McNally Political Science Series, chapter II.B.6, pages 162-80. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago, 1964. [ bib ]
[264] George Vossos, John Zeleznikow, Tharam Dillon, and Vivian Vossos. An example of integrating legal case based reasoning with object-oriented rule-based systems: IKBALS II. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-91), pages 31-41, St Catherine's College, Oxford, 25-28 June 1991. [ bib ]
[265] R.F. Walker, P.G.M. Zeinstra, and P.H. van den Berg. A model to model knowledge about knowledge or implementing meta-knowledge in PROLEXS. In G.P.V. Vandenberghe, editor, Advanced Topics of Law and Information Technology, number 3 in Computer/Law Series, pages 235-60. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, 1989. [ bib ]
[266] D.A. Waterman and Mark Peterson. Rule-based models of legal expertise. In Proceedings of the First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-80), pages 272-5, Stanford University, 18-21 August 1980. [ bib ]
[267] Donald A. Waterman, Jody Paul, and Mark Peterson. Expert systems for legal decision making. In J. Ross Quinlan, editor, Applications of Expert Systems, chapter 2, pages 23-47. Addison-Wesley, Sydney, 1987. Based on the proceedings of the Second Australian Conference on Applications of Expert Systems, May 1986. [ bib ]
[268] Joseph Weizenbaum. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1976. [ bib ]
[269] Frederick Bernays Wiener. Decision prediction by computers: Nonsense cubed-and worse. American Bar Association Journal, 48(11):1023-8, November 1962. [ bib ]
[270] W.T. Williams. Principles of clustering. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2:303-26, 1971. [ bib ]
[271] Marshal S. Willick. Professional malpractice and the unauthorized practice of professions: Some legal and ethical aspects of the use of computers as decision-aids. In Charles Walter, editor, Computing Power and Legal Reasoning, chapter 28, pages 817-63. West Publishing Company, St Paul, 1985. [ bib ]
[272] Niklaus Wirth. What can we do about the unnecessary diversity of notation for syntactic definitions? Communications of the ACM, 20(11):822-3, November 1977. [ bib ]
[273] Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, third edition, 1974. Translation of Philosophische Untersuchungen (1953). [ bib ]
[274] David E. Wolstenholme. Amalgamating regulation- and case-based advice systems through suggested answers. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-89), pages 63-7, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 13-16 June 1989. [ bib ]
[275] Charles M. Yablon. Law and metaphysics. The Yale Law Journal, 96(3):613-36, January 1987. Review of [123]. [ bib ]
[276] Masoud Yazdani and Ajit Narayanan, editors. Artificial Intelligence: Human Effects. Ellis Horwood Series in Artificial Intelligence. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1984. [ bib ]

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.94.