About me
Contact me My research Courses Humour Fencing Quote for the Day Home |
## You've come to Doug Aberdeen's old pages. In 5 seconds you will taken to my new pages http://sml.nicta.com.au/~daa/## PROOFSProof by Example: The author gives only the case n=2 and suggests that it contains most of the ideas of the general proof. Proof by Intimidation: "Trivial." Proof by Cumbersome Notation: Best done with access to at least four alphabets and special symbols. Proof by Exhaustion: An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is useful. Proof by Omission: "The reader may supply the details." "The other 253 cases are analogous." Proof by Obfuscation: A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless syntactically related statements. Proof by Wishful Citation: The author cites a negation, converse, or generalization of a theorem from the literature to support his claims. Proof by Funding: How could nine different government agencies be wrong? Proof by Picture: A more convincing form of proof by example. Works well with proof by omission. Proof by Vehement Assertion: It is useful to have some kind of authority relation to the audience. Proof by Ghost Reference: Nothing even remotely resembling the cited Theorem appears in the reference given. Proof by Forward Reference: Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the author, which is not often as forthcoming as the first. Proof by Semantic Shift: Some standard but inconvenient definitions are changed for the statement of the result. Proof by Appeal to Intuition: Cloud shaped drawings frequently help here. Proof by Elimination of the Counter-Example: "Assume for the moment that the hypothesis is true. Now let's suppose we find a counter-example. so what? QED" Proof by Assumption: "For the last century no one acquainted with the facts has disputed..." an equivalent statement is, "I did not look up the actual facts but since most people I know think this way, it follows that everyone else does too." Proof by Eminent Authority: "I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP-complete." Proof by Personal Communication: "Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete." [Karp, personal communication] Proof by Reduction to the Wrong Problem: "To see that infinite-dimensional colored-cycle stripping is decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem." Proof by Reference to Inaccessible Literature: The author sites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found in a privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian Philological Society, 1883. Proof by Importance: A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in question. Proof by Accumulated Evidence: Long and diligent search has not revealed a counter-example. Proof by Mutual Reference: In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in Reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in Reference C which is an easy consequence of Theorem A. Proof by Metaproof: A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques. Proof by Assertion: This is correct. |

The views and opinions expressed on this web page are not necessarily those of NICTA or the Australian National University. Any HTML or image from this page may be copied and re-used freely but must not be sold. Feedback:Doug.Aberdeen AT anu.edu.au